Refimprove date July 2011 Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants Brandenburgv. Ohio ArgueDate February 27 ArgueYear 1969 DecideDate June 9 DecideYear 1969 FullName Clarence Brandenburgv. State of Ohio USVol 395 USPage 444 Citation 89 S. Ct. 1827 23 L. Ed. 2d 430 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1367 48 Ohio Op. 2d 320 Prior Defendant convicted, Ohio Courts of Common Pleas Court of Common Pleas , Hamilton County, Ohio , Dec. 5, 1966 affirmed without opinion, Ohio District Courts of Appeal Court of Appeals of the First Appellate District of Ohio , Feb. 16, 1968 appeal dismissed without opinion, Supreme Court of Ohio June 12, 1968 probable jurisdiction noted, 393 U.S. 948 1968 Subsequent None Holding Ohio s criminal syndicalism ... Amendment to the United States Constitution XIV Ohio Rev. Code 2923.13 Brandenburgv. Ohio , ussc ... Kissing, Brandenburgv. Ohio, Cincinnati Magazine, August 2001, pp. 14 15. ref Portions of the rally ... Further reading cite book chapter Brandenburgv. Ohio last Parker first Richard A. title Free Speech ... 145&ndash 159 External links caselaw source case Brandenburgv. Ohio , 395 U.S. 444 1969 findlaw http ... Library entry on Brandenburgv. Ohio US1stAmendment speech state expanded DEFAULTSORT BrandenburgV. Ohio Category United States Supreme Court cases Category United States free speech case law Category ... Ohio s criminal syndicalism statute, because that statute broadly prohibited the mere advocacy of violence. In the process, Whitney v. California , ussc 274 357 1927 was explicitly overruled, and doubt was cast on Schenck v. United States , ussc 249 47 1919 , Abrams v. United States , ussc 250 616 1919 , and Dennis v. United States , ussc 341 494 1951 . Background Clarence Brandenburg, a Ku Klux ... of Common Pleas Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County, Ohio Hamilton County , Brandenburg was fined ... Ohio First District Court of Appeal affirmed Brandenburg s conviction, rejecting his claim that the statute ... Amendment law in the pre Brandenburg era. Although Yates v. United States , 354 U.S. 298 1957 ... more details
Norwood, Ohiov. Horney Case citation 110 Ohio St.3d 353 was a case brought before the Ohio Supreme Court in 2006. The case came upon the heels of Kelo v. City of New London , in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that commercial development justified the use of eminent domain . Kelo had involved the United States Constitution , while the issue in Norwood was the specific limitations of the Ohio State Constitution . In the Norwood case, the city wished to seize about seventy homes and businesses to make way for private development, including retail, offices, and condominiums. ref Columbus Dispatch http www.dispatch.com news story.php?story dispatch 2006 07 27 20060727 A1 00.html Score One for Ohio Property Owners ref Homeowners Joe Horney, Carl and Joy Gamble, and Matthew and Sanae Burton, filed three separate cases to stop the seizure of their homes. Following appeals, these cases were combined into the Supreme Court case Norwood v. Horney . The court found unanimously for the homeowners. Justice Maureen O Connor wrote the majority opinion, which ruled that economic benefit alone was insufficient to satisfy the eminent domain statute of the Ohio Constitution that an Ohio statute allowing for the use of eminent domain seizures in the case of deteriorating areas was void for vagueness and that the rest of this statute should remain in force. It also specified for the Ohio ... rod newpdf 0 2006 2006 Ohio 3799.pdf Norwood v. Horney ref ref http www.sconet.state.oh.us communications office summaries 2006 0726 050227.asp Supreme Court of Ohio ref Original cases http www.sconet.state.oh.us rod newpdf 0 2006 2006 Ohio 3799.pdf Norwood v. Horney http www.sconet.state.oh.us rod newpdf 1 2004 2004 ohio 4661.pdf Gamble v. Norwood http www.sconet.state.oh.us rod newpdf 1 2005 2005 ohio 5720.pdf Norwood v. Burton References Reflist Category United States land use case law Category Ohio state case law Category 2006 in United States case law Category 2006 in Ohio ... more details
SCOTUSCase Litigants Jacobellis v. Ohio ArgueDate March 26 ArgueYear 1963 DecideDate June 22 DecideYear 1964 FullName Nico Jacobellis v. Ohio USVol 378 USPage 184 Citation 84 S. Ct. 1676 12 L. Ed. 2d 793 1964 U.S. LEXIS 822 28 Ohio Op. 2d 101 Prior Defendant convicted, Ohio Courts of Common Pleas Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, Ohio , 6 3 60 affirmed, 175 N.E.2d 123 Ohio Ct.App. 1961 affirmed, 179 N.E.2d 777 Ohio 1962 Subsequent None Holding The First Amendment, as applied through the Fourteenth, protected a movie theater manager from being prosecuted for possessing and showing a film ... v. California . See also Elephant test List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 378 I know it when I see it External links wikisource inline Jacobellis v. Ohio caselaw source case Jacobellis v. Ohio , 378 U.S. 184 1964 findlaw http caselaw.lp.findlaw.com scripts getcase.pl?court us&vol ... faclibrary case.aspx?case Jacobellis v OH First Amendment Library entry on Jacobellis v. Ohio US1stAmendment speech state expanded DEFAULTSORT Jacobellis V. Ohio Category 1964 in United States case ... U.S. Const. amends. I , Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution XIV Ohio Rev. Code 2905.34 Jacobellis v. Ohio , ussc 378 184 1964 , was a Supreme Court of the United States United States Supreme Court decision handed down in 1964 involving whether the state of Ohio could, consistent ... Heights, Ohio , was convicted and fined 2500 by a judge of the Cuyahoga County, Ohio Cuyahoga County Ohio Courts of Common Pleas Court of Common Pleas for exhibiting the film, and his conviction was upheld by the Supreme Court of Ohio . The U.S. Supreme Court reversed the conviction, ruling ... the confused state of the Court s obscenity jurisprudence and argued that Ohio s action was consistent with the Court s decision in Roth v. United States and furthered important state interests. Justice ... States First Amendment case law Category Cleveland Heights, Ohio Category Pornography law ... more details
unreferenced date January 2008 Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants Osborne v. Ohio ArgueDate December 5 ArgueYear 1989 DecideDate April 18 DecideYear 1990 FullName Clyde Osborne v. State of Ohio USVol 495 USPage 103 Citation Prior Conviction affirmed by the Ohio Court of Appeals and Ohio Supreme Court. Defendant appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. Subsequent Statute upheld case remanded for new trial. Holding The First Amendment allows states to outlaw the mere possession, as distinct from the distribution, of child pornography. SCOTUS 1989 1990 Majority White JoinMajority Rehnquist, Blackmun, O Connor, Scalia, Kennedy Concurrence Blackmun JoinConcurrence Concurrence2 JoinConcurrence2 Concurrence Dissent JoinConcurrence Dissent Dissent Brennan JoinDissent Marshall, Stevens Dissent2 JoinDissent2 LawsApplied U.S. Const. First Amendment to the United States Constitution amend. I Osborne v. Ohio , ussc ... Court External links wikisource Osborne v. Ohio caselaw source case Osborne v. Ohio , 495 ... V. Ohio Category United States First Amendment case law Category United States obscenity case law .... In so doing, the Court extended the holding of New York v. Ferber , ussc 458 747 1982 , which ... to the United States Constitution First Amendment challenge, and distinguished Stanley v. Georgia , ussc ... of pornography by adults in their own homes. The Court also determined that the Ohio law at issue was not overbroad, relying on a narrowing interpretation of the law the Ohio Supreme Court had adopted ... Ohio for attempting to stamp out this vice at all levels in the distribution chain. Even if the First ... argued that the Ohio statute under which he was convicted was overbroad. A ban on speech is overbroad ... was protected expression. But the Ohio Supreme Court had held that the statute only applied to nudity ..., the Ohio Supreme Court had required that the defendant had to know that the images depicted children ..., the Ohio Supreme Court had sufficiently tailored the law only to those images most harmful ... more details
Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants Doyle v. Ohio ArgueDate February 23 ArgueYear 1976 DecideDate June 17 DecideYear 1976 FullName Doyle v. Ohio USVol 426 USPage 610 Citation Prior Subsequent Holding The defendant s silence in response to a Miranda warning cannot be used against them. SCOTUS 1975 1981 Majority Powell JoinMajority Burger, Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall Dissent Stevens JoinDissent Blackmun, Rehnquist Dissent2 JoinDissent2 LawsApplied Doyle v. Ohio , ussc 426 610 1976 , is a United States Supreme Court case regarding the Due Process rights of the Fourteenth Amendment. Holding The Supreme Court held that the criminal defendant s silence in response to a Miranda warning cannot be construed to imply an admission. See also List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 426 Jenkins v. Anderson , ussc 447 231 1980 Further reading cite journal last O Keefe first F. R. authorlink coauthors year 1976 month title Impeaching a Defendant s Testimony by Proof of Post Arrest Silence Doyle v. Ohio journal Cleveland State Law Review volume 25 issue 2 pages 261&ndash 296 issn 0009 8876 url accessdate quote Category United States Supreme Court cases Category United States Fifth Amendment self incrimination case law Category 1976 in United States case law SCOTUS case stub ... more details
SCOTUSCase Litigants Ohiov. Robinette ArgueDate October 8 ArgueYear 1996 DecideDate November 18 DecideYear 1996 FullName State of Ohiov. Robert D. Robinette USVol 519 USPage 33 Citation 519 U.S. 33 Prior Conviction reversed by the Ohio Supreme Court , 653 N.E.2d 695 Ohio 1995 certiorari granted, 516 U.S. 1157 1996 Subsequent Holding The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Fourth Amendment does not require the police to inform a motorist during a traffic stop that they are free to go before asking questions unrelated to the purpose of the stop. SCOTUS 1994 2005 Majority Rehnquist JoinMajority O Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Breyer Concurrence Ginsburg Dissent Stevens LawsApplied Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution U.S. Const. amend. IV In Ohiov. Robinette , Case citation 519 U.S. 33 1996 , the Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Supreme Court ... Court cases by volume External links wikisource inline Ohiov. Robinette http supct.law.cornell.edu ... of Dayton, Ohio , Robinette was stopped for speeding. After verifying that Robinette had no prior .... Robinette then pleaded no contest to the charge. On appeal, the Ohio District Courts of Appeal Ohio District Court of Appeal reversed the conviction, ruling that the search resulted from an illegal detention. The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed, ruling that the police must end a traffic stop by informing ..., as the Court has repeatedly held. In fact, in Schneckloth v. Bustamonte , ussc 412 218 1973 , the Court had rejected a rule similar to the one adopted by the Ohio Supreme Court in this case. In Schneckloth ... used as a pretext to search for drugs&mdash the Ohio Supreme Court was free to adopt the first tell then ask rule it articulated as part of Ohio law, without imposing that requirement on the rest ... of the Ohio Supreme Court were derived entirely from federal law, and thus did not impose a new ... noted he would have affirmed the judgment of the Ohio Supreme Court. See also List of United States ... more details
SCOTUSCase Litigants Lockett v. Ohio ArgueDate January 17 ArgueYear 1978 DecideDate July 3 DecideYear 1978 FullName Lockett v. Ohio USVol 438 USPage 586 Prior Subsequent Holding The judgment was reversed insofar as it upheld the death penalty, and the case was remanded. SCOTUS 1975 1981 Majority Burger JoinMajority Stewart, White, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, and Stevens Concurrence Blackmun Concurrence2 Marshall Concurrence3 White Concurrence4 Rehnquist Dissent JoinDissent Dissent2 JoinDissent2 Dissent3 LawsApplied Lockett v. Ohio , Case citation 438 U.S. 586 1978 is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that sentencing authorities must have the discretion to consider every possible mitigating factor, rather than being limited to a specific list of factors. See also List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 438 References reflist External links http www.law.cornell.edu supct html historics USSC CR 0438 0586 ZS.html Text of the opinion from cornell.edu Category United States Supreme Court cases Category Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause and death penalty case law Category United States Fifth Amendment self incrimination case law Category United States Sixth Amendment jury case law Category Capital punishment in Ohio Category 1978 in United States case law case law stub SCOTUS stub ... more details
Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants Ohiov. Roberts ArgueDate ArgueYear DecideDate DecideYear 1980 FullName Ohiov. Hershel Roberts USVol 448 USPage 56 Citation Prior Subsequent Holding The introduction in evidence at respondent s trial of the daughter s preliminary hearing testimony was constitutionally permissible. SCOTUS 1975 1981 Majority Blackmun JoinMajority Burger, Stewart, White, Powell, Rehnquist Dissent Brennan JoinDissent Marshall, Stevens LawsApplied Overruled Crawford v. Washington 2004 Ohiov. Roberts , Case citation 448 U.S. 56 1980 , is a United States Supreme Court decision dealing with the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution . Factual background Herschel Roberts was charged with forgery of a check and with possession of stolen credit card s. At the preliminary hearing , defense counsel called the victims daughter to the stand and tried to elicit from her an admission that she provided defendant with the checks and the credit card but failed to inform the defendant that she did not have permission to use them. Counsel was unable to elicit this admission nor did the prosecutor cross examine the witness. The daughter was subpoena ed ... Ohiov. Roberts is no longer controlling authority. The Supreme Court later ruled, in Crawford v. Washington ... links http www.law.cornell.edu supct html historics USSC CR 0448 0056 ZS.html Ohiov. Roberts ... , offered the transcript of the daughter s testimony pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code Ann. Section ... the transcript and the defendant was convicted. The Supreme Court of Ohio overturned the conviction ... s recent decision in Michigan v. Bryant may signal a resurrection of Roberts, as the Court ... v bryantofretreating fromcrawford v washi.html ref See also California v. Green , ussc 399 149 1970 , established the concept of the indicia of reliability . Mancusi v. Stubbs , ussc 408 204 1972 Crawford v. Washington , ussc 541 36 2004 , a later case which reiterated some and rejected other findings ... more details
Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants Mapp v. Ohio ArgueDate March 29 ArgueYear 1961 DecideDate June 19 DecideYear 1961 FullName Dollree Mapp v. State of Ohio USVol 367 USPage 643 Citation 81 S. Ct. 1684 6 L. Ed. 2d 1081 1961 U.S. LEXIS 812 86 Ohio L. Abs. 513 16 Ohio Op. 2d 384 84 A.L.R.2d 933 Prior Defendant convicted, Cuyahoga County, Ohio Cuyahoga County , Ohio Courts of Common Pleas Ohio Court of Common Pleas affirmed, Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed, 166 N.E.2d 387 Ohio 1960 Subsequent Rehearing denied ... Mapp v. Ohio , ussc 367 643 1961 , was a landmark case in criminal procedure , in which the Supreme ... of its contents. ref name FindLaw http laws.findlaw.com us 367 643.html MAPP v. OHIO, 367 ... broadly enforced at the state level until the decision in Mapp v. Ohio . The case was decided ... cite book first Carolyn last Long year 2006 title Mapp v. Ohio Guarding Against Unreasonable Searches ... first Potter authorlink coauthors year 1983 month title The Road to Mapp v. Ohio and beyond The Origins ... from use in criminal prosecutions. Ohio Supreme Court reversed. SCOTUS 1958 1962 Majority Clark JoinMajority ... certain lewd and lascivious books, pictures, and photographs in violation of 2905.34 of Ohio s Revised Code. ref The officers arrested Mapp for violating an Ohio law which prohibited the possession ... name FindLaw At her trial in the Ohio Courts of Common Pleas Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, Ohio Cuyahoga County , Mapp was Conviction convicted based on the evidence that was presented ... one. On appeal , the Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed, Mapp appealed further to the Supreme Court of Ohio ... government might use the fruits of an illegal search, if at all. In two previous cases Boyd v. United States and Weeks v. United States , the court said that the federal government may not use such evidence ... in court. However, this rule had not been previously applied to state courts. In Weeks v. United States 1914 the Supreme Court created the exclusionary rule for federal prosecutions. In Wolf v. Colorado ... more details
SCOTUSCase Litigants Terry v. Ohio ArgueDate December 12 ArgueYear 1967 DecideDate June 10 DecideYear 1968 FullName John W. Terry v. State of Ohio USVol 392 USPage 1 Citation 88 S. Ct. 1868 20 L. Ed. 2d 889 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1345 44 Ohio Op. 2d 383 Prior Defendant s motion to suppress evidence denied , 32 Ohio Op. 2d 489 1964 defendant convicted , 95 Ohio L. Abs. 321 Ohio Courts of Common Pleas Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, Ohio Cuyahoga County 1964 affirmed , 214 North Eastern Reporter N.E.2d 114 Ohio District Courts of Appeal Ohio Ct. App. 1966 review denied , Ohio Supreme Court , Nov ... to the United States Constitution U.S. Const. amend. IV wikisource Terry v. Ohio , Case citation ... other actions by state agents. For this purpose the exclusionary rule of Mapp v. Ohio , ussc ... toll in human injury and frustration of efforts to prevent crime. Terry v. Ohio 392 U.S. 1, 14 15 In view ... Beck v. Ohio , ussc 379 89 1964 The reasonableness inquiry takes into account the nature and extent ... 392 U.S. 1, at 16, Fn 12, quoting State v. Terry , 5 Ohio App. 2d 122, at 130 Chief Justice Warren ... Court cases, volume 392 External links caselaw source case Terry v. Ohio , 392 U.S. 1 1968 findlaw ... cases terry vohio oral arguments.htm Transcript of the oral argument http www.stokescleveland.org .... Supreme Court of Ohio affirmed. SCOTUS 1967 1969 Majority Warren JoinMajority Black, Brennan, Stewart ... appellate court affirmed the conviction, and the Ohio State Supreme Court dismissed the appeal ... justification for the search is protection of the officer and public The Ohio Court of Appeals ... that could be used against the officer, as Chief Justice Warren noted In this case, for example, the Ohio ... jurisdictions, and the Court cited these remarks in dicta in Berkemer v. McCarty , ussc 468 420 1984 , at 439. However, in Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada , ussc 542 177 2004 , the Court ... Terry set the precedent for Michigan v. Long , 463 U.S. 1032 1983 . In an opinion citing Terry ... more details
Two other uses the German state the town Brandenburg an der Havel Infobox German state Name Brandenburg German name state coa Brandenburg Wappen.svg coa size coa link Coat of arms of Brandenburg map Deutschland ... key 12 population 2522493 pop ref ref name Bev lkerungsstand Brandenburg Cite web url http www.statistik ... im Land Brandenburg am 31.12.2008 nach amtsfreien Gemeinden, mtern und Gemeinden publisher Amt f r Statistik Berlin Brandenburg accessdate 2010 01 03 ref pop date 2008 12 31 GDP 48 GDP year 2005 ... BB Kfz formerly BP small 1945 1947 small , SB small 1948 1953 ref BP Brandenburg Province, SB Soviet Zone, Brandenburg. With the abolition of states in East Germany in 1952 vehicle registration followed ... DE4 latd 52 latm 21 lats 43 longd 13 longm 0 longs 29 date September 2010 Brandenburg Audio De Brandenburg.ogg ... the reunification of the former West Germany and East Germany . The capital is Potsdam . Brandenburg ... Northern March , the Margraviate of BrandenburgBrandenburg Prussia grew to become the core of the Kingdom of Prussia kingdom , later Free State of Prussia . The East Brandenburg eastern third of historic Brandenburg Ostbrandenburg Neumark was ceded to Poland Oder Neisse border in 1945 . History This section is linked from Theodor Fontane History of Brandenburg and Prussia Main Margraviate of Brandenburg In late medieval and early modern times, Brandenburg was one of seven prince elector ... dynasty from 1415, it contained the future German capital Berlin . After 1618 the Margraviate of Brandenburg and the Duchy of Prussia were combined to form Brandenburg Prussia , which was ruled by the same ... connections of Berlin, and the status of Brandenburg s ruler as prince elector together were instrumental in the rise of that state. Early Middle Ages Main Northern March Brandenburg is situated ..., Slavic peoples are believed to have settled in the Brandenburg area. The Slavs expanded from ... Slavic groups in the present day area of Brandenburg were the Hevelli in the west and the Sprevane ... more details
Infobox alpine ski racer name Will Brandenburg image caption country United States disciplines Slalom skiing Slalom , Alpine skiing combined Combined club Schweitzer Mountain Schweitzer Racing School skis Fischer Skis Fischer boots Fischer bindings Fischer sponsor birth date Bda 1987 01 01 birth place Walla Walla, Washington , United States U.S. height height ft 6 in 1 weight weight lb 195 wcdebut December 16, 2008 Alpine Skiing World Cup 2007 br age 21 retired website http www.willbrandenburgusa.com willbrandenburgusa.com olympicteams 1 Alpine skiing at the 2010 Winter Olympics 2010 olympicmedals 0 olympicgolds worldsteams 1 FIS Alpine World Ski Championships 2011 2011 worldsmedals 0 worldsgolds wcseasons 2nd 2011 Alpine Skiing World Cup 2011 2012 Alpine Skiing World Cup 12 wcwins wcpodiums 0 wcoveralls 0 wctitles 0 show medals yes medaltemplates MedalSport Men s Alpine skiing at the Winter Olympics alpine skiing MedalCountry the br USA Will Brandenburg born January 1, 1987 is a FIS Alpine Ski World Cup World Cup Alpine skiing alpine ski racer on the United States Ski Team U.S. Ski Team . Born in Walla Walla, Washington , he moved with his family to Spokane, Washington Spokane as a youth. He began skiing and racing at Bluewood Ski Area Ski Bluewood near Dayton, Washington Dayton ..., he also played high school football for the Panthers. Brandenburg was named to the U.S. team ... WC&Search Select FIS Ski.com World Cup season standings Will Brandenburg http alpine.usskiteam.com athletes will brandenburg U.S. Ski Team profile Will Brandenburg http www.willbrandenburgusa.com willbrandenburgusa.com personal site Persondata Metadata see Wikipedia Persondata . NAME Brandenburg, Will ALTERNATIVE ... PLACE OF DEATH DEFAULTSORT Brandenburg, Will Category Alpine skiers at the 2010 Winter Olympics Category ... Category Living people US alpine skiing bio stub de Will Brandenburg it Will Brandenburg no Will Brandenburg pl Will Brandenburg ru , ... more details
SCOTUSCase Litigants McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission ArgueDate October 12 ArgueYear 1994 DecideDate April 19 DecideYear 1995 FullName Joseph McIntyre, executor of Estate of Margaret McIntyre, deceased, petitioner v. Ohio Elections Commission, et al. USVol 514 USPage 334 Citation Prior Subsequent Holding An Ohio statute that prohibits anonymous political or campaign literature is unconstitutional. SCOTUS 1994 2005 Majority Stevens JoinMajority O Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsberg, Breyer Concurrence Ginsberg JoinConcurrence Concurrence2 Thomas JoinConcurrence2 Concurrence Dissent JoinConcurrence Dissent Dissent Scalia JoinDissent Rhenquist Dissent2 JoinDissent2 LawsApplied First Amendment to the United States Constitution U.S. Const. amend. I br Ohio Code 3599.09 A McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission , Case citation 514 U.S. 334 1995 , ref name findlaw http caselaw.lp.findlaw.com scripts ... opinions supreme A710TooMuchMediavHale.pdf Too Much Media, LLC v. Hale N.J. 2011 , slip. op. at 37, fn. 5, citing McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission , 514 U.S. 334, 341 43, 115 S. Ct. 1511, 1516 ... of Findlaw.com. ref was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that an Ohio statute ... Margaret McIntyre, a taxpayer , passed out pamphlets that opposed a proposed school tax. The Ohio Elections Commission found her guilty of violating Ohio Code 3599.09 A , which forbade the distribution ... to the Court of Common Pleas, which reversed. The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed that court, putting back the fine. The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed the Appellate jurisdiction appellate court. She ..., the Supreme Court distinguished the McIntyre rule in Doe v. Reed , 561 U.S. 2010 . In Doe , they held ... Doe v. Reed courtesy of the Supreme Court website . Accessed June 7, 2011. ref This holding came out ... posted her identity. ref Too Much Media, LLC v. Hale, , supra , slip. op. at 38, fn. 5. ref During ... Court Related cases National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama , 357 ... more details
class infobox style width 25em font size 95 colspan 2 bgcolor 6699FF Castillo v. Case Farms of Ohio colspan 2 align center United States District Court for the Western District of Texas Filed Decided December 1, 1999 Case name Castillo v. Case Farms of Ohio Citations 96 F. Supp. 2d 578 Holding Labor Agency is an agent for farm. Farm is liable for wrongful actions of the labor agency. Judge Senior District Judge Laws applied Agency law Castillo v. Case Farms of Ohio , 96 F Supp. 2d 578, is a case involving poor working conditions for migratory workers. It established that an Agency law principal agent relationship existed between Case Farms and America s Tempcorps ATC that allowed Case Farms to be liable for its agent s actions. Facts Migrant workers Migrant farm workers were recruited in Texas by America s Tempcorps to work in Case Farm s Ohio based chicken processing plant. They were given a bus ticket and 20 for three days of food. Upon arriving they found themselves living in conditions called distressing and deplorable by the court. The employees were packed in to unfurnished rooms infested with cockroaches and rats. The workers slept on the floor and were transported in an overcrowded van. Issue The working conditions were largely not refuted. At issue was 1 whether or not American s Tempcorps ATC was an agent of Case Farms, and 2 if agency existed, whether that agency make Case Farms liable for ATC s actions. Complaint The plaintiffs alleged Violations of the http finduslaw.com migrant and seasonal agricultural worker protection msawp 29 u s code chapter 20 Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act Violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act Breach of Contract Fraud Negligence Negligent Misrepresentation Plaintiff s Argument Castillo argued that agency relationship existed between ATC and Case Farms, and the scope of that relationship included both the Agency ... that Case Farms expressly authorized ATC to recruit and hire people to work at Case Farms Ohio plant ... more details
Brandenburg is one of Germany s sixteen Bundesl nder federal states . Brandenburg may also refer to Places Brandenburg an der Havel , a town in Brandenburg, Germany Margraviate of Brandenburg , medieval German principality, at times partitioned into Brandenburg Ansbach , margraviate Brandenburg Bayreuth , margraviate Brandenburg Kulmbach , margraviate Brandenburg K strin , margraviate Brandenburg Schwedt , margraviate Brandenburg Stendal , margraviate Brandenburg Prussia , a historical state consisting of the Margraviate of Brandenburg and the Duchy of Prussia Province of Brandenburg , a province of Prussia, Germany Neubrandenburg New Brandenburg , a town in Mecklenburg Western Pomerania, Germany Brandenburg, Kentucky , a city in the United States Brandenburg Frisches Haff , former name of Ushakovo, Kaliningrad Oblast in Russia People Erich Brandenburg , German historian Jim Brandenburg , nature photographer Karlheinz Brandenburg , audio engineer and creator of the MP3 format William H. Brandenburg , U.S. Army Major General Other uses Brandenburg concertos , a collection of instrumental works by Johann Sebastian Bach Brandenburg Gate , a city gate in Berlin, Germany Brandenburgers , a German commando unit during World War II Brandenburgv. Ohio , a United States Supreme Court case Brandenburg Gate Potsdam , a triumphal arch in Potsdam, Germany Brandenburg Gate Kaliningrad , a city gate in Kaliningrad, Russia Brandenburg novel Brandenburg novel , also titled Brandenburg Gate , by Henry Porter journalist Henry Porter Brandenburg, a novel by Glenn Meade Jerome Robbins 1997 Brandenburg ballet Brandenburg class battleship Brandenburg class battleship a class of battleships built by Germany in the 1890s. Brandenburg class frigate a class of frigates operated by the German Navy See also List of rulers of Brandenburg List of places in Brandenburg disambig geo surname als Brandenburg be , bg br Brandenburg dishe velout cs Braniborsko rozcestn k ... more details
Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. United States ArgueDate March 12 ArgueYear 1923 DecideDate April 9 DecideYear 1923 FullName Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. United States USVol 261 USPage 592 Citation 58 Ct.Cl. 709 43 S.Ct. 425 67 L.Ed. 816 Prior Subsequent Holding An implied in fact contract exists as, an agreement founded upon a meeting of minds, which, although not embodied in an express contract, is inferred, as a fact, from conduct of the parties showing, in the light of the surrounding circumstances, their tacit understanding. SCOTUS 1923 1925 Majority Sanford JoinMajority Concurrence JoinConcurrence Concurrence2 JoinConcurrence2 Concurrence Dissent JoinConcurrence Dissent Dissent JoinDissent Dissent2 JoinDissent2 LawsApplied Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. United States , 261 U.S. 592 1923 , is a US Supreme Court case on contract law . The Supreme Court held that an implied in fact contract exists as, an agreement founded upon a meeting of minds , which, although not embodied in an express contract, is inferred, as a fact, from conduct of the parties showing, in the light of the surrounding circumstances, their tacit understanding. Facts Empty section date July 2010 Judgment Empty section date July 2010 See also List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 261 External links wikisource Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. United States Full text of judgment from http supreme.justia.com us 261 592 case.html Justia Category United States Supreme Court cases Category United States contract case law Category 1923 in United States case law Category Baltimore and Ohio Railroad SCOTUS case stub ... more details
NOTOC Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio ArgueDateA January 6 ArgueDateB 7 ArgueYear 1915 DecideDate February 23 DecideYear 1915 FullName Mutual Film Corporation, Appellant v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, et al. USVol 236 USPage 230 Citation Prior Subsequent Holding The free speech protection of the Ohio Constitution did not extend to motion pictures. SCOTUS 1914 1916 Majority McKenna JoinMajority unanimous court LawsApplied Overruled Joseph Burstyn, Inc v. Wilson 1952 Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio , Case citation 236 U.S. 230 1915 , was a court case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States United States Supreme Court in 1915, in which, in a 9 0 vote, the Court ruled that the free speech protection of the Ohio Constitution &mdash which was substantially similar to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution &mdash did not extend to motion picture s. The state government of Ohio had passed a statute in 1913 forming a board of censorship censors which had the duty of reviewing and approving all films intended to be exhibited in the state. The board charged a fee for the approval service. The board could order the arrest of anyone showing an unapproved film in the state. The Court stated Cquote the exhibition of moving pictures is a business, pure and simple, originated and conducted for profit not to be regarded, nor intended to be regarded by the Ohio Constitution, we think, as part of the press of the country, or as organs of public opinion. The Court described movies in some technical detail and noted their popularity, but wrote they may be used for evil, and for this reason, We cannot regard the censorship of movies as beyond the power of government. The Court added it would ... source case Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio , 236 U.S. 230 1915 findlaw .... In May 1952, the Supreme Court overruled its Mutual decision in Joseph Burstyn, Inc v. Wilson , popularly ... more details
About the daughter of Albert III the daughter of Otto V Beatrice of Brandenburg infobox nobility name Beatrix of Brandenburg image caption noble family House of Ascania father Albert III, Margrave of Brandenburg Salzwedel mother Matilda of Denmark spouse Henry II, Lord of Mecklenburg birth date birth place death date death date 1314 9 22 df y death place Wismar Beatrix of Brandenburg died 22 September 1314 in Wismar was the first wife of Lord Henry II, Lord of Mecklenburg Henry II the Lion of Mecklenburg 1266 1329 , whom she married in 1292 at Burg Stargard Stargard Castle ref Stargarder Burgenverein Burg Stargard, Eine mittelalterliche H henburg , Schnell & Steiner, 2003, 2nd revised edition ref . Beatrix was the daughter of Margrave Albert III, Margrave of Brandenburg Salzwedel Albert III of Brandenburg and his wife, Matilda of Denmark. Their wedding in 1292 is historically significant because Beatrix brought the Lordship of Stargard as dowry into the marriage and thus into the hands of Mecklenburg . Beatrix s marriage did not produce a male heir, so the Ascanians reckoned Stargard fell back to Brandenburg when she died. Mecklenburg disagreed and this led to the so called North German Margrave War . Mecklenburg won and under the terms of the Treaty of Templin of 1317, Stargard definitively became part of Mecklenburg. External links http www.emecklenburg.de Niklot i0105.htm Beatrix of Brandenburg Translation Ref de Beatrix von Brandenburg Germany hist stub Germany noble stub Footnotes references DEFAULTSORT Beatrix of Brandenburg Category House of Ascania Category House of Mecklenburg Category 13th century births Category 1314 deaths Category Year of birth uncertain Category 14th century German people Category German nobility Personal Data NAME Beatrix of Brandenburg ALTERNATIVE NAMES Beatrix von Brandenburg German SHORT DESCRIPTION Duchess by marriage of Mecklenburg ... von Brandenburg ... more details
Mark Brandenburg may refer to Mark Brandenburg baseball born 1970 The historical Margraviate of Brandenburg in Germany The historical Province of Brandenburg in Germany The present day federal state of Brandenburg in Germany disambig ... more details
About the daughter of Otto V the daughter of Albert III Beatrix of Brandenburg infobox nobility name Beatrice of Brandenburg image caption noble family House of Ascania father Otto V, Margrave of Brandenburg Salzwedel mother Judith of Henneberg spouse Bolko I the Strict br W adys aw of Bytom birth date circa 1270 birth place death date before 26 April 1316 death place Beatrice of Brandenburg lang pl Beatrycze Brandenburska , lang de Beatrix von Brandenburg ca. 1270 bef. 26 April 1316 , was a German princess and a member of the House of Ascania in the Brandenburg branch. By her two marriages she was Duchess of widnica and Ko le Bytom Siewierz . She was the second daughter of Otto V, Margrave of Brandenburg Salzwedel Otto V the Long , Margrave of Brandenburg Salzwedel , by his wife Judith of Henneberg, daughter of Count Herman I, Count of Henneberg Herman I of Henneberg and heiress of Coburg ... her brothers, Albert and Otto died young and the eldest, Herman, Margrave of Brandenburg Salzwedel Herman , inherited the whole paternal domains. Beatrice s young sister Matilda of Brandenburg d. 1298 ... of Poland . The other two sisters are Kunigunde, who died unmarried, and Judith of Brandenburg d ... IV Probus, Duke of Wroclaw . To that end, he decided to enter in an alliance with the Margraves of Brandenburg ... of Brandenburg Salzwedel assumed the regency of his domains and the guardianship of her children. The custody of Henry V the Fat s sons and the regency of his lands were taken by King Wenceslaus ... http fmg.ac Projects MedLands BRANDENBURG, 20PRUSSIA.htm Beatrixdied13121316 BRANDENBURG http roglo.eu roglo?lang en i 324105 Beatrix von Brandenburg Metadata see Wikipedia Persondata Persondata NAME Beatrice of Brandenburg ALTERNATIVE NAMES Beatrix von Brandenburg German Beatrycze Brandenburska ... of Brandenburg Category 1270s births Category 1316 deaths Category House of Ascania Category House of Piast Category Medieval women id Beatrix von Brandenburg jv Beatrix von Brandenburg ... more details
Infobox Former Country native name Hochstift Brandenburg conventional long name Prince Bishopric of Brandenburg common name Prince Bishopric of Brandenburg continent Europe region Central Europe country ... reign est. date start event1 date event1 event2 de facto supremacy of br spaces 4 Electorate of Brandenburg Electoral Brandenburg date event2 br 1373 event3 electors privileged to br spaces 4 choose ... as part of br spaces 4 Electoral Brandenburg date end event pre diocese founded br spaces 4 and restored ... of arms of None.svg 20px Image missing p2 image p2 p3 image p3 p4 image p4 s1 Electorate of Brandenburg image s1 File Wappen Mark Brandenburg.png 20px Electoral Brandenburg s2 image s2 s3 image s3 ... of arms of the Prince Bishopric of Brandenburg capital Brandenburg an der Havel Brandenburg upon ... Bodecker Stephan leader3 Regent John George, Elector of Brandenburg John George leader4 Regent Joachim III Frederick, Elector of Brandenburg Joachim Frederick year leader1 1173 1179 year leader2 1421 ... area4 stat pop4 stat year5 stat area5 stat pop5 footnotes Accepts wikilinks The Bishopric of Brandenburg ... in the Uckermark to the north. Its seat was Brandenburg an der Havel Brandenburg upon Havel . It was a state ... to gain control over a significant territory, being overshadowed by the Margraviate of Brandenburg , which ... immunity immunity district , distinct from the city of Brandenburg. Only in 1929 the meanwhile ... left 280px The Cathedral of Ss. Peter and Paul in Brandenburg upon Havel, nineteenth century. The diocese ... region revived the bishopric. Bishop Wigers, Bishop of Brandenburg Wigers 1138 60 was the first ... see see until 1447 in that year a bull of Pope Nicholas V Nicholas V gave the right of nomination to the elector of Brandenburg , with whom the bishops stood in a close feudal relation. File Burg ... of the Prince Bishopric of Brandenburg. As rulers of imperial immediacy , regnant in a, however, dispersed territory partitioned into the four bailiwicks lang de mter of Brandenburg Havel, Ketzin , Teltow ... more details
Infobox former country native name Mark Markgrafschaft Brandenburg conventional long name March Margraviate of Brandenburg common name Brandenburg continent Europe country Germany status Vassal empire ... 1806 p1 Northern March image p1 File Sin escudo.svg 20px alt s1 Province of Brandenburg flag s1 Flagge ... year start 1157 event1 Raised to Prince elector Electorate date event1 25 December 1356 event2 Brandenburg ... end Dissolution of the br Holy Roman Empire date end 6 August year end 1806 capital Brandenburg an der Havel br Berlin from 1417 government type Monarchy title leader Margrave of Brandenburg Margrave ... Lutheran br Calvinism Calvinist image coat Wappen Mark Brandenburg.png The Margraviate of Brandenburg lang de Markgrafschaft Brandenburg was a major principality of the Holy Roman Empire from 1157 to 1806. Also known as the March of Brandenburg Mark Brandenburg , it played a pivotal role in the history of Germany and Central Europe . Brandenburg developed out of the Northern March founded in the territory ... Emperor . The state thus became additionally known as Electoral Brandenburg or the Electorate of Brandenburg Kurf rstentum Brandenburg or Kurbrandenburg . The House of Hohenzollern came to the throne of Brandenburg in 1415. Under Hohenzollern leadership, Brandenburg grew rapidly in power during the 17th century and inherited the Duchy of Prussia . The resulting Brandenburg Prussia was the predecessor ... in Brandenburg and its capitals Berlin and Potsdam . Although the Margraviate of Brandenburg ended ... of Brandenburg in 1815. Despite its meager beginnings in the sandpit sandbox of the Holy Roman Empire ... Empire in 1871. The Mark Brandenburg is still used informally today to refer to the States of Germany federal state of Brandenburg in the Germany Federal Republic of Germany . Geography History of Brandenburg and Prussia The territory of the former margraviate, commonly known as the Mark Brandenburg ... the majority of the present day States of Germany German states Brandenburg and Berlin , the Altmark ... more details
I of Denmark house House of Hohenzollern father John Cicero, Elector of Brandenburg mother Margaret ... 5 3 1487 8 27 df y death place Kiel place of burial Anna of Brandenburg 27 August 1487 &ndash 3 May 1514 was a German nobility German noblewoman . Anna was the daughter of Johann Cicero , Elector of Brandenburg and Margarethe of Saxony . She was born in Berlin, Margraviate of BrandenburgBrandenburg ... they were second cousins Frederick s mother Dorothea of Brandenburg was the cousin of Anna s father ... Joachim I Nestor, Elector of Brandenburg Joachim and Frederick s niece Elisabeth were married ... color ffc boxstyle 4 background color bfc boxstyle 5 background color 9fe 1 1. Anna of Brandenburg 2 2. John Cicero, Elector of Brandenburg 3 3. Margaret of Thuringia 4 4. Albrecht III, Elector of Brandenburg ... 8 8. Frederick I, Elector of Brandenburg 9 9. Elisabeth of Bavaria 10 10. Jacob, Margrave ... 14 14. Albert II of Germany 15 15. Elizabeth of Luxembourg 16 16. Frederick V, Burgrave ... see Wikipedia Persondata Persondata NAME Anna of Brandenburg ALTERNATIVE NAMES Anna af Brandenburg ... Berlin, Margraviate of Brandenburg DATE OF DEATH 3 May 1514 PLACE OF DEATH Kiel , Holstein DEFAULTSORT Brandenburg, Margravine Anna Of Category 1487 births Category 1514 deaths Category People from Berlin Category People from the Margraviate of Brandenburg Category House of Hohenzollern Category House of Oldenburg Germany noble stub cs Anna Braniborsk da Anna af Brandenburg de Anna von Brandenburg 1487 1514 es Ana de Brandeburgo nl Anna van Brandenburg no Anna av Brandenburg pt Ana de Brandemburgo ru 1487 1514 sv Anna av Brandenburg ... more details
infobox nobility name Magdalene of Brandenburg image MagdaleneBrandHeDa.jpg caption Magdalene of Brandenburg noble family House of Hohenzollern father John George, Elector of Brandenburg mother Elisabeth of Anhalt Zerbst spouse Louis V, Landgrave of Hesse Darmstadt birth date birth date 1582 1 7 df yes birth place Berlin death date death date and age 1616 5 4 1582 1 7 df yes death place Darmstadt Magdalene of Brandenburg , also Magdalene and Magdalen, 7 January 1582 &ndash 4 May 1616 was the daughter of John George, Elector of Brandenburg and his third wife Elisabeth of Anhalt Zerbst . She married Louis V, Landgrave of Hesse Darmstadt . Ancestors class wikitable Magdalena s ancestors in three generations rowspan 8 align center Magdalena von Brandenburg rowspan 4 align center Father br John George, Elector of Brandenburg rowspan 2 align center Paternal Grandfather br Joachim II Hector, Elector of Brandenburg align center Paternal Great grandfather br Joachim I Nestor, Elector of Brandenburg align center Paternal Great grandmother br Elizabeth of Denmark, Electress of Brandenburg Elisabeth ... Grandfather br Joachim Ernest, Prince of Anhalt align center Maternal Great grandfather br John V, Prince of Anhalt Zerbst Johann V Prince of Anhalt Zerbst align center Maternal Great grandmother br Margarete of Brandenburg 1511 1577 Margarete of Brandenburg rowspan 2 align center Maternal Grandmother ... M hlingen align center Maternal Great grandmother br Agnes of Mansfeld Issue She married Louis V, Landgrave ... Metadata see Wikipedia Persondata Persondata NAME Magdalene of Brandenburg ALTERNATIVE NAMES Magdalena von Brandenburg German SHORT DESCRIPTION Landgravine consort of Hesse Darmstadt 1598 1616 DATE OF BIRTH ... Brandenburg, Magdalena Von Category 1582 births Category 1616 deaths Category House of Hesse Darmstadt Magdalene of Brandenburg Category House of Hohenzollern Magdalene of Brandenburg Category Landgravines of Hesse Darmstadt de Magdalena von Brandenburg 1582 1616 it Maddalena di Brandeburgo pt ... more details
Encyclopedia
top
