Infobox court case name Bernstein I court UnitedStates District Court for the Northern District of California date decided April 15, 1996 full name Daniel J. Bernstein et al., v. UnitedStates Department ... Dissent by Nelson NOTOC Bernsteinv. UnitedStates is a set of court cases brought by Daniel J. Bernstein challenging restrictions on the export of cryptography from the UnitedStates . The case was first brought in 1995, when Bernstein was a student at University of California, Berkeley , and wanted ... case EFF Archive of the Cases DEFAULTSORT BernsteinV. UnitedStates Category Cryptography law Category UnitedStates Internet case law Category Electronic Frontier Foundation ... opinions Infobox court case name Bernstein II court UnitedStates District Court for the Northern District of California date decided December 9, 1996 full name Daniel J. Bernstein et al., v. UnitedStates Department of State et al. citations 945 F. Supp. 1279 judges Marilyn Hall Patel prior actions subsequent actions opinions Infobox court case name Bernstein III imagesize 120 court UnitedStates Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit date decided August 25, 1997 full name Daniel J. Bernstein et al., v. UnitedStates Department of State et al. citations 176 F.3d 1132 judges Betty Binns ... status ref See also Portal Cryptography Junger v. Daley Notes Reflist References Bernsteinv. UnitedStates Dept. of Justice , 192 F.3d 1308 9th Cir. 1999 order that case be reheard en banc Bernsteinv. DOC , 2004 U.S. Dist. 6672 N.D. Cal. April 19, 2004 External links http cr.yp.to export.html Bernstein ... and one regulatory change, the UnitedStates Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Ninth Circuit ... Amendment to the UnitedStates Constitution First Amendment and that the government s regulations ... decision 9 cir.html Bernsteinv. USDOJ 9th Cir. May 6, 1999 Electronic Privacy Information Center ... Summary Bernsteinv. U.S. Dept. of State http www.epic.org crypto export controls bernstein decision ... more details
Patton v. UnitedStates may refer to UnitedStates Supreme Court decisions Patton v. UnitedStates 1895 Patton v. UnitedStates , ussc 159 500 1895 Patton v. UnitedStates 1936 Patton v. UnitedStates , ussc 281 276 1930 disambig ... more details
There are two legal cases named Dowling v. UnitedStates Dowling v. UnitedStates 1985 Dowling v. UnitedStates , ussc 473 207 1985 , concerning copyright Dowling v. UnitedStates 1990 Dowling v. UnitedStates , ussc 493 342 1990 , concerning double jeopardy Disambig ... more details
Allen v. UnitedStates is the name of four different cases heard by the Supreme Court of the UnitedStates Allen v. UnitedStates 1893 Allen v. UnitedStates ussc 150 551 1893 Allen v. UnitedStates 1895 Allen v. UnitedStates ussc 157 675 1895 Allen v. UnitedStates 1896 Allen v. UnitedStates ussc 164 492 1896 Allen v. UnitedStates 1907 Allen v. UnitedStates ussc 204 581 1907 disambig ... more details
UnitedStatesv. Johnson may refer to a number of UnitedStates Supreme Court cases UnitedStatesv. Johnson 1863 UnitedStatesv. Johnson 1863 UnitedStatesv. Johnson 1899 UnitedStatesv. Johnson 1899 UnitedStatesv. Johnson 1911 UnitedStatesv. Johnson 1911 UnitedStatesv. Johnson, 319 U.S. 302 1943 UnitedStatesv. Johnson , 319 U.S. 302 1943 UnitedStatesv. Johnson, 319 U.S. 503 1943 UnitedStatesv. Johnson , 319 U.S. 503 1943 UnitedStatesv. Johnson 1944 UnitedStatesv. Johnson 1944 UnitedStatesv. Johnson 1946 UnitedStatesv. Johnson 1946 UnitedStatesv. Johnson 1966 UnitedStatesv. Johnson 1966 UnitedStatesv. Johnson 1968 UnitedStatesv. Johnson 1968 UnitedStatesv. Johnson 1982 UnitedStatesv. Johnson 1982 UnitedStatesv. Johnson 1987 UnitedStatesv. Johnson 1987 UnitedStatesv. Johnson 2000 UnitedStatesv. Johnson 2000 See also List of UnitedStates Supreme Court cases, volume 481 List of UnitedStates Supreme Court cases Lists of UnitedStates Supreme Court cases by volume List of UnitedStates Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court Disambig ... more details
Morgan v. U.S. is the name of a number of noted Supreme Court cases Morgan v. UnitedStates 1936 Morgan v. UnitedStates 1871 81 U.S. 531 Morgan v. UnitedStates 1885 Morgan v. UnitedStates 1885 113 U.S. 476 , a case involving several judgments of the UnitedStates Court of Claims in four cases against the UnitedStates for the payment of UnitedStates bonds known as five twenty bonds Morgan v. UnitedStates 1936 Morgan v. UnitedStates 1936 298 U.S. 468 Morgan v. UnitedStates 1938 Morgan v. UnitedStates 1938 304 U.S. 1 See also UnitedStatesv. Morgan 1953 UnitedStatesv. Morgan 1953 , a U.S. district court case involving antitrust accusations against 17 Wall Street firms disambiguation ... more details
Taylor v. UnitedStates may refer to UnitedStates Supreme Court cases Taylor v. UnitedStates 1832 John Taylor v. UnitedStates 44 U.S. 197 1832 Taylor v. UnitedStates 1973 , 414 U.S. 17 1973 Taylor v. UnitedStates 1990 Arthur Lajuane Taylor v. UnitedStates 495 U.S. 575 1990 disambig ... more details
Mitchel v. UnitedStates could refer to Aboriginal title in the Marshall Court Mitchel v. UnitedStates 1835 Mitchel v. UnitedStates 1835 Aboriginal title in the Taney Court Spanish Florida Mitchel v. UnitedStates 1841 disambig ... more details
Jones v. UnitedStates may refer to UnitedStates Supreme Court cases Jones v. UnitedStates 1836 Walter F Jones v. UnitedStates 48 U.S. 681 1836 Jones v. UnitedStates 1890 Henry Jones v. UnitedStates 137 U.S. 202 1890 Jones v. UnitedStates 1960 Cecil Jones v. UnitedStates 362 U.S. 257 1960 Jones v. UnitedStates 1983 Michael Jones v. UnitedStates 463 U.S. 354 1983 Jones v. UnitedStates 1999 Nathaniel Jones v. UnitedStates 526 U.S. 227 1999 UnitedStatesv. Antoine Jones , a case currently under consideration by the Supreme Court of the UnitedStates having to deal with GPS tracking. See also List of UnitedStates Supreme Court cases Lists of UnitedStates Supreme Court cases by volume disambig ... more details
Cleveland v. UnitedStates is the name for several UnitedStates Supreme Court cases. For the 1946 case about polygamy Cleveland v. UnitedStates 1946 For the 2000 case about mail fraud Cleveland v. UnitedStates 2000 disambig ... more details
Stewart v. UnitedStates refers to a number of cases heard by the Supreme Court of the UnitedStates , including UnitedStatesv. Stewart 1795 , ussc 2 343 1795 Dall. 2 Stewart v. UnitedStates 1855 , ussc 58 116 1855 How. 17 Stewart v. UnitedStates 1907 , ussc 206 185 1907 UnitedStatesv. Stewart 1940 , ussc 311 60 1940 Stewart v. UnitedStates 1942 , ussc 316 354 1942 Stewart v. UnitedStates 1961 , ussc 366 1 1961 It also refers to a case heard by the UnitedStates Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit UnitedStatesv. Stewart 2003 , a case heard and decided in 2003 and then reconsidered by that same court in 2006 in light of an intervening Supreme Court decision Category UnitedStates Supreme Court cases disambig ... more details
UnitedStates Supreme Court cases titled Davis v. UnitedStates Davis v. UnitedStates 2011 564 U.S. Davis v. UnitedStates 1994 512 U.S. 452 Davis v. UnitedStates 1990 495 U.S. 472 charitable deductions under 170 of the Internal Revenue Code Davis v. UnitedStates 1974 417 U.S. 333 Davis v. UnitedStates 1973 411 U.S. 233 Davis v. UnitedStates 1969 394 U.S. 574 Davis v. UnitedStates 1960 364 U.S. 505 Davis v. UnitedStates 1946 328 U.S. 582 Davis v. UnitedStates 1897 165 U.S. 373 Davis v. UnitedStates 1895 160 U.S. 469 disambig See also List of UnitedStates Supreme Court cases, volume 495 List of UnitedStates Supreme Court cases Lists of UnitedStates Supreme Court cases by volume List of UnitedStates Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court ... more details
Cross v. UnitedStates may refer to Cross v. UnitedStates 1871 A case involving Congressional reference of a government contract dispute. Cross v. UnitedStates 1916 A case regarding remuneration for clerks of the court for the copying and docketing of naturalization claims. Disambig ... more details
James v. UnitedStates may refer to the following decisions of the Supreme Court of the UnitedStates James v. UnitedStates 1906 James v. UnitedStates 1906 , ussc 202 401 1906 , which held that a justice of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia was a judge of the UnitedStates for purposes of the federal statutory scheme for judicial salary, regardless of whether that court was established under Article I or Article III of the U.S. Constitution. James v. UnitedStates 1961 James v. UnitedStates 1961 , ussc 366 213 1961 , which held that illegally obtained money was federally taxable income regardless of whether it was repaid as restitution to a victim. James v. UnitedStates 2007 James v. UnitedStates 2007 , 550 U.S. 2007 , which held that attempted burglary was a predicate felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act. disambig ... more details
UnitedStatesv. Oregon may refer to UnitedStatesv. State of Oregon 295 U.S. 1 , a UnitedStates Supreme Court case from 1935 concerning a quiet title action UnitedStatesv. State of Oregon II UnitedStatesv. State of Oregon II 295 U.S. 701 , a UnitedStates Supreme Court case from 1935 concerning a quiet title action UnitedStatesv. Oregon 1961 UnitedStatesv. Oregon 1961 366 U.S. 643 , UnitedStates Supreme Court case from 1961 concerning the property of a veteran who died intestate Sohappy v. Smith 302 F.Supp. 899 , a 1969 UnitedStates federal district court case concerning fishing rights of Native Americans combined with UnitedStatesv. Oregon Gonzales v. Oregon , a 2006 UnitedStates Supreme Court case in which the UnitedStates Department of Justice challenged the Oregon Death with Dignity Act disambiguation ... more details
Bond v. UnitedStates can refer to one of two unique cases decided by the UnitedStates Supreme Court, having nothing to do with each other Bond v. UnitedStates 2000 , a case in Fourth Amendment jurisprudence Bond v. UnitedStates 2011 , a case in Tenth Amendment jurisprudence disambig Category UnitedStates Supreme Court cases ... more details
Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants Hester v. UnitedStates ArgueDate April 24 ArgueYear 1924 DecideDate May 5 DecideYear 1924 FullName Hester v. UnitedStates USVol 265 USPage 57 Citation 44 S.Ct. 445 68 L.Ed. 898 Prior Subsequent Holding The special protection accorded by the Fourth Amendment to the people in their persons, houses, papers and effects , is not extended to the open fields. SCOTUS 1923 1925 Majority Holmes JoinMajority unanimous court LawsApplied Hester v. UnitedStates , Case citation 265 U.S. 57 1924 , was a decision by the UnitedStates Supreme Court , which established the open fields doctrine . In an opinion written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Oliver Wendell Holmes , the court held that the special protection accorded by the Fourth Amendment to the UnitedStates Constitution Fourth Amendment to the people in their persons, houses, papers and effects , is not extended to the open fields. See also List of UnitedStates Supreme Court cases, volume 265 Katz v. UnitedStates 1967 Oliver v. UnitedStates 1984 Category UnitedStates Supreme Court cases Category UnitedStates Fourth Amendment case law Category 1924 in UnitedStates case law SCOTUS case stub ... more details
Wright v. UnitedStates was the name of several UnitedStates Supreme Court cases. The most significant was the case of 1938 302 U.S. 583 which partly overruled the court s earlier decision in the Pocket Veto Case . case law stub SCOTUS stub Category UnitedStates Supreme Court cases ... more details
UnitedStatesv. Wise may refer to several court cases, including the following UnitedStatesv. Wise 1962 370 U.S. 435 , a Supreme Court case dealing with the enforceability of Sherman Act sanctions against corporate officers UnitedStatesv. Wise 1977 550 F.2d 1180 , a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals case examining the first sale doctrine disambig ... more details
Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants UnitedStatesv. Chadwick ArgueDate April 26 ArgueYear 1977 DecideDate June 21 DecideYear 1977 FullName UnitedStatesv. Chadwick et al. USVol 433 USPage 1 Citation Prior Subsequent Holding Absent exigency, the warrantless search of double locked luggage just placed in the trunk of a parked vehicle is a violation of the Fourth Amendment and not justified under the automobile exception. SCOTUS 1975 1981 Majority Burger JoinMajority Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall, Powell, Stevens Concurrence Brennan Dissent Blackmun JoinDissent Rehnquist LawsApplied Fourth Amendment to the UnitedStates Constitution Fourth Amendment UnitedStatesv. Chadwick , Case citation 433 U.S. 1 1977 , was a decision by the UnitedStates Supreme Court , which held that, absent exigency , the warrantless search of double locked luggage just placed in the trunk of a parked vehicle is a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the UnitedStates Constitution Fourth Amendment and not justified under the automobile exception . The court reasoned that while luggage is movable like an automobile, it does not have the lesser expectation of privacy associated with an automobile. The Supreme Court later cast doubt on Chadwick s holding in California v. Acevedo 1991 , though it declined to explicitly overrule it. See also List of UnitedStates Supreme Court cases, volume 433 Carroll v. UnitedStates , ussc 267 132 1925 Arkansas v. Sanders , ussc 442 753 1979 UnitedStatesv. Ross , ussc 456 798 1982 California v. Greenwood , ussc 486 35 1988 External links note citation caselaw source case UnitedStatesv. Chadwick , 433 U.S. 1 1977 findlaw http caselaw.lp.findlaw.com scripts getcase.pl?navby CASE&court US&vol 433&page 1 justia http supreme.justia.com us 433 1 case.html Category UnitedStates Supreme Court cases Category UnitedStates Fourth Amendment case law Category 1977 in UnitedStates case law SCOTUS case stub ... more details
Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants Fedorenko v. UnitedStates ArgueDate October 15 ArgueYear 1980 DecideDate January 21 DecideYear 1981 FullName Feodor Fedorenko v. UnitedStates USVol 449 USPage 490 Citation 101 S.Ct. 737 66 L.Ed.2d 686 Prior Certiorari to the UnitedStates Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Subsequent Holding As a person who had assisted the enemy in persecuting civilians, Fedorenko s visa was illegally procured and therefore his citizenship must be revoked under 340 a of the Immigration and Nationality Act. SCOTUS 1975 1981 Majority Marshall JoinMajority Brennan, Stewart, Powell, Rehnquist Concurrence Burger Concurrence2 Blackmun Dissent White Dissent2 Stevens LawsApplied Fedorenko v. UnitedStates , ussc 449 490 1981 , was a UnitedStates Supreme Court case which held that people who assisted in Nazi persecutions, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, were not eligible for Visa document visas to enter the UnitedStates, and thus could not legally obtain UnitedStates citizenship. It has been used as an important precedent in many denaturalization cases against former Nazis. See also Chaunt v. UnitedStates , Ussc 364 350 1960 Rogers v. Bellei , ussc 401 815 1971 Kungys v. UnitedStates , ussc 485 759 1988 Negusie v. Holder , ussc 555 511 2009 Bo eslavs Maikovskis , Latvian Nazi collaborator, fled the U.S. before his extradition Anton Geiser , who lost his US citizenship for similar reasons, this case having played an important part in the process Further reading Citation first Abbe L. last Dienstag title Fedorenko v. UnitedStates War Crimes, the Defense of Duress, and American Nationality Law journal Columbia Law Review volume 82 issue 1 year 1982 pages 120 183 doi 10.2307 1122241 . Category UnitedStates immigration and naturalization case law Category UnitedStates Supreme Court cases Category 1981 in UnitedStates case law SCOTUS stub ... more details
SCOTUSCase Litigants UnitedStatesv. Eichman ArgueDate May 14 ArgueYear 1990 DecideDate June 11 DecideYear 1990 FullName UnitedStatesv. Shawn Eichman et al. USVol 496 USPage 310 Citation Prior Consolidation of UnitedStatesv. Eichman D.D.C. , 731 F.Supp. 1123 1990 and UnitedStatesv. Haggerty W.D.Wash ... JoinDissent Rehnquist, White, O Connor LawsApplied First Amendment to the UnitedStates Constitution U.S. Const. amend. I UnitedStatesv. Eichman , Case citation 496 U.S. 310 1990 was a Supreme Court of the UnitedStatesUnitedStates Supreme Court case that invalidated a federal law against flag desecration as violative of free speech under the First Amendment to the UnitedStates Constitution First Amendment to the UnitedStates Constitution Constitution . It was argued together with the case UnitedStatesv. Haggerty . It built on the opinion handed down in the Court s 1989 decision in Texas v. Johnson , which invalidated on First Amendment grounds a Texas state statute banning flag burning ... case.aspx?case US v Eichman First Amendment Library entry on Eichman v. UnitedStates http www.firstamendmentcenter.org faclibrary case.aspx?case Street v NY Street v. New York http www.firstamendmentcenter.org faclibrary case.aspx?case TX v Johnson Texas v. Johnson US1stAmendment speech state expanded DEFAULTSORT UnitedStatesV. Eichman Category UnitedStates Supreme Court cases Category UnitedStates Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court Category UnitedStates free speech case law Category 1990 in UnitedStates case law Category Flag controversies in the UnitedStates ... for the 104th UnitedStates Congress 104th session , the Flag Desecration Amendment was first ... not been considered since the 109th Congress. See also Flag desecration Street v. New York Texas v. Johnson Flag Protection Act Flag Desecration Amendment External links caselaw source case UnitedStatesv. Eichman , 496 U.S. 310 1990 findlaw http caselaw.lp.findlaw.com scripts getcase.pl?court ... more details
Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants Girouard v. UnitedStates ArgueDate March 4 ArgueYear 1946 DecideDate April 22 DecideYear 1946 FullName James Girouard v. UnitedStates USVol 328 USPage 61 Citation 66 S.Ct. ... v. UnitedStates , ussc 328 61 1946 , was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the UnitedStates . It concerned a Pacifism pacifist applicant for naturalization who in the interview declared not to be willing to fight for the defense of the UnitedStates . The case questioned a precedent set by UnitedStatesv. Schwimmer in 1929 that denied an applicant entry to the UnitedStates because of her pacifist stance. Girouard v. UnitedStates overturned that precedent by voting in favor of Girouard ... day Adventist beliefs. ref http supreme.justia.com us 328 61 case.html GIROUARD V. UNITEDSTATES, 328 ... Retrieved on 2011 03 23. ref ref http religiousfreedom.lib.virginia.edu court us v giro.html UnitedStatesv. Girouard Religious Freedom Page . Religiousfreedom.lib.virginia.edu. Retrieved on 2011 03 23. ref ref http scholar.google.com scholar case?case 18033687998249500279 Girouard v. UnitedStates ... to Rosika Schwimmer s UnitedStatesv. Schwimmer who said, My cosmic consciousness of belonging to the human ... in Girouard v. UnitedStates from the bench Stone had planned to read his dissent afterwards. 15 He is the only Supreme Court Justice to have died during an open court session. Notes Girouard v. UnitedStates overturned three previous Supreme Court decisions. They were UnitedStatesv. Schwimmer http supreme.justia.com us 279 644 case.html 279 US 644 UnitedStatesv. Macintosh http supreme.justia.com us 283 605 case.html 283 US 605 UnitedStatesv. Bland http supreme.justia.com us 283 636 283 US 636 See also List of UnitedStates Supreme Court cases, volume 328 References wikisource reflist Category UnitedStates Supreme Court cases Category 1946 in UnitedStates case law Category United ... applied to become an Citizenship in the UnitedStates American citizen . When asked if he would fight ... more details
merge Swift & Co. v. UnitedStates discuss Talk Swift & Co. v. UnitedStates Merger proposal date September 2009 Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants Swift v. UnitedStates ArgueDate January 6 ArgueDateB 9 ArgueYear 1905 DecideDate January 30 DecideYear 1905 FullName Swift & Company, et al., Appts. v. UnitedStates USVol 196 USPage 375 Citation 25 Sup. Ct. 276 49 L. Ed. 518 Prior Subsequent Holding Although meatpackers activity was geographically local, they had an important effect on the current of commerce, and thus could be regulated under the Commerce Clause. SCOTUS 1903 1906 Majority Holmes JoinMajority Concurrence JoinConcurrence Concurrence2 JoinConcurrence2 Concurrence Dissent JoinConcurrence Dissent Dissent JoinDissent Dissent2 JoinDissent2 LawsApplied Swift v. UnitedStates , Case citation 196 U.S. 375 1905 , was a decision by the UnitedStates Supreme Court , which held that the Commerce Clause covered meatpackers although their activity was geographically local, they had an important effect on the current of commerce , and thus could be regulated under the Commerce Clause. The Court s decision halted price fixing by Swift & Company . See also List of UnitedStates Supreme Court cases, volume 196 Further reading cite journal last Baldwin first William L. authorlink coauthors year 1969 month title The Feedback Effect of Business Conduct on Industry Structure journal Journal of Law and Economics volume 12 issue 1 pages 123&ndash 153 doi 10.1086 466662 url accessdate quote External links caselaw source case Swift v. UnitedStates , 196 U.S. 375 1905 findlaw http laws.findlaw.com us 196 375.html justia http supreme.justia.com us 196 375 case.html DEFAULTSORT Swift V. UnitedStates Category UnitedStates Supreme Court cases Category UnitedStates antitrust case law Category 1905 in UnitedStates case law Category Meat processing in the UnitedStates Category UnitedStates Dormant Commerce Clause case law SCOTUS case stub ... more details
Encyclopedia
top
